콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

EPA declares burning wood is same as solar and wind energy

Politics 어제
At the behest of Congress, Scott Pruitt announced a new Environmental Protection Agency policy that treats burning wood, or biomass, as a carbon-neutral energy source. Climate change experts contend that the science isn’t settled and that the policy ignores the greenhouse gases that result from wood burning.
@ClimateNexus 님이 공유한 사진
· 4월 23일

. spotted in central Georgia, announcing EPA policy that burning wood is carbon-neutral. Congress directed EPA to do so, but EPA's science advisers haven't come to a consensus on the issue

. Chief here in middle GA today announcing new policy allowing biogenic emissions (from biomass) to be carbon-neutral. Huge for GA and SE USA. May help us to use it in electricity generation. Rule making to follow.
이 스레드 보기
답글 13개 리트윗 71개 90 마음
· 4월 23일

It’s been a great day in GA! Big policy announcement on carbon neutrality of forest biomass. Managed forests improve air & water quality, while creating jobs & products that improve our daily lives. This is environmental stewardship in action.

Administrator Pruitt Promotes Environmental Stewardship with Forestry Leaders and Students in Georgia | US EPA
EPA News Release: Administrator Pruitt Promotes Environmental Stewardship with Forestry Leaders and Students in Georgia
epa.gov
답글 429개 리트윗 56개 138 마음
· 4월 23일

Trump EPA now considers burning wood to be carbon-neutral, breaking with scientists

Pruitt declares that burning wood is carbon neutral
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declared Monday that burning trees is carbon neutral.
thehill.com
답글 61개 리트윗 200개 136 마음
· 4월 23일

EPA declares burning wood to be a carbon neutral energy source, something scientists have been warning against for the past few years.

Pruitt declares that burning wood is carbon neutral
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declared Monday that burning trees is carbon neutral.
thehill.com
답글 13개 리트윗 152개 229 마음
· 4월 24일

This is ridiculously anti-science. Measuring emissions from burning forest biomass is complicated. But calling it all carbon neutral is laughably wrong.

It’s been a great day in GA! Big policy announcement on carbon neutrality of forest biomass. Managed forests improve air & water quality, while creating jobs & products that improve our daily lives. This is environmental stewardship in action.
답글 5개 리트윗 239개 564 마음
· 4월 24일

In the eyes of the current administration, burning wood for energy is now just as environmentally friendly as wind and solar power, despite the fact that burning biomass releases greenhouse gases.

President Trump's EPA Says Burning Wood is Carbon Neutral, Like Wind and Solar Energy
The awkwardly named Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has declared that burning wood is carbon neutral. In the eyes of the Trump regime, burning wood for energy is now just as environmentally friendly as wind and solar power, despite the fact that burning biomass releases greenhouse gases.
gizmodo.com
답글 45개 리트윗 466개 701 마음
· 4월 24일

"While burning wood immediately releases carbon, it takes decades or even a century for a replacement tree to absorb the same amount of carbon. In the meantime, all that atmospheric carbon will continue to drive climate change."

The EPA Declared That Burning Wood Is Carbon Neutral. It's Actually a Lot More Complicated
Here are five things to know about the controversial change
smithsonianmag.com
답글 4개 리트윗 141개 272 마음
· 4월 23일

Burning wood (biomass) for electricity can provide economic and waste management benefits, but it's generally bad to awful for the air and climate. Shunning science, Congress told EPA to treat biomass as carbon neutral. And that's what EPA is going to do.

EPA's Scott Pruitt says burning wood is renewable energy
The Environmental Protection Agency will begin treating energy created by burning trees as renewable, the same as wind and solar.
washingtonexaminer.com
답글 4개 리트윗 89개 160 마음
· 4월 24일

EPA chief Scott Pruitt's declaration that burning biomass—such as wood—is "carbon neutral" isn't simply rebranding, it could have substantial ramifications for tax subsidies like renewable energy credits funded by taxpayers at the state & federal level

Scott Pruitt wades into a fraught science debate, declaring biomass burning ‘carbon neutral’
Scientists aren't sure that's really true.
washingtonpost.com
리트윗 58개 94 마음
· 4월 23일

"Today, the numbers don’t lie: burning forest biomass for electricity is dirtier than coal and is uneconomic without massive subsidies." , Senior Advocate .

Biomass Advocates to U.S. Pols in 2017: Avoid Mistakes of EU
While European Union countries like the United Kingdom continue to burn forest biomass—primarily in the form of imported wood pellets—to produce electricity, analysis conducted in 2017 shows it’s a bad bet financially and for the environment, underscoring the dangers of...
nrdc.org
답글 5개 리트윗 143개 233 마음
· 4월 23일

“Scott Pruitt’s scorched-earth approach at the EPA continues unabated...Pruitt is once again rewarding his industry pals," Sami Yassa, senior scientist NRDC. “This will lead to more destruction of our treasured forests and more dangerous carbon pollution.”

Pruitt declares that burning wood is carbon neutral
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declared Monday that burning trees is carbon neutral.
thehill.com
답글 6개 리트윗 142개 209 마음
· 4월 24일

"The idea that biomass is carbon neutral is contentious among scientists, who fear that forests, once cleared so their wood can be used for energy, may not grow back as planned." via

Scott Pruitt wades into a fraught science debate, declaring biomass burning ‘carbon neutral’
Scientists aren't sure that's really true.
washingtonpost.com
답글 3개 리트윗 59개 119 마음
· 4월 24일

The decision is a one-two punch against conservation and climate action, and Pruitt issued the official policy “clarification” in a meeting with Georgia forest industry leaders, who will no doubt benefit from this misinterpretation of science.

Burning trees is now (somehow) carbon-neutral
The EPA now considers biomass a renewable source of energy—which is good for industry but bad news for climate change and wildlife.
nrdc.org
리트윗 68개 108 마음
· 4월 24일

The Energy 202: Why Scott Pruitt's decision on burning wood is so high stakes

Analysis | The Energy 202: Why Scott Pruitt's decision on burning wood is so high stakes
The notion that biomass is carbon neutral is contentious among scientists.
washingtonpost.com
답글 10개 리트윗 47개 72 마음

더 많은 모멘트 보기
Ford will slowly phase out sedans from its North American lineup
Business 3시간 전
The automaker will focus on SUVs, trucks and commercial vehicles while halting production on most of its sedans. The Mustang and a new Focus Active will be the only two passenger cars coming from the brand in the future.
263 마음에 들어요
Groom, once-paralyzed while playing football, walks wife down the aisle
US news 오늘 저녁
Chris Norton was given a 3% chance of regaining mobility below his neck after he fractured his C3 and C4 vertebrae during a college football game in 2010. Nearly eight years later, Norton has defeated the odds and walked seven yards down the aisle with his fiancée Emily Summers at their wedding.
2,252 마음에 들어요
Girl has leg reattached backwards so she can dance again
Health 오늘 일찍
Amelia Eldred from Tamworth, England, was diagnosed with bone cancer in her left leg last year and had surgery to amputate the limb. Doctors at Royal Orthopaedic Hospital in Birmingham performed a rare procedure called rotationplasty to reattach the lower part of the leg backwards to allow the ankle joint to work as a knee joint.
4,376 마음에 들어요
Some Chinese startups are looking for 'attractive' women to comfort male coders
World news 오늘 오후
According to The New York Times, some Chinese tech startup companies are looking to hire "attractive" women as "programmer motivators" to chat up and assure overworked male coders.
505 마음에 들어요

민감한 내용의 콘텐츠를 포함한 모멘트일 수 있습니다.

이전
다음