跳到内容

EPA declares burning wood is same as solar and wind energy

Politics 昨天
At the behest of Congress, Scott Pruitt announced a new Environmental Protection Agency policy that treats burning wood, or biomass, as a carbon-neutral energy source. Climate change experts contend that the science isn’t settled and that the policy ignores the greenhouse gases that result from wood burning.
来自 @ClimateNexus 的照片
· 4月23日

. spotted in central Georgia, announcing EPA policy that burning wood is carbon-neutral. Congress directed EPA to do so, but EPA's science advisers haven't come to a consensus on the issue

. Chief here in middle GA today announcing new policy allowing biogenic emissions (from biomass) to be carbon-neutral. Huge for GA and SE USA. May help us to use it in electricity generation. Rule making to follow.
显示这个主题帖
13回复 71 转推 90 喜欢
· 4月23日

It’s been a great day in GA! Big policy announcement on carbon neutrality of forest biomass. Managed forests improve air & water quality, while creating jobs & products that improve our daily lives. This is environmental stewardship in action.

Administrator Pruitt Promotes Environmental Stewardship with Forestry Leaders and Students in Georgia | US EPA
EPA News Release: Administrator Pruitt Promotes Environmental Stewardship with Forestry Leaders and Students in Georgia
epa.gov
429回复 56 转推 138 喜欢
· 4月23日

Trump EPA now considers burning wood to be carbon-neutral, breaking with scientists

Pruitt declares that burning wood is carbon neutral
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declared Monday that burning trees is carbon neutral.
thehill.com
61回复 200 转推 136 喜欢
· 4月23日

EPA declares burning wood to be a carbon neutral energy source, something scientists have been warning against for the past few years.

Pruitt declares that burning wood is carbon neutral
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declared Monday that burning trees is carbon neutral.
thehill.com
13回复 152 转推 229 喜欢
· 4月24日

This is ridiculously anti-science. Measuring emissions from burning forest biomass is complicated. But calling it all carbon neutral is laughably wrong.

It’s been a great day in GA! Big policy announcement on carbon neutrality of forest biomass. Managed forests improve air & water quality, while creating jobs & products that improve our daily lives. This is environmental stewardship in action.
5回复 239 转推 564 喜欢
· 4月24日

In the eyes of the current administration, burning wood for energy is now just as environmentally friendly as wind and solar power, despite the fact that burning biomass releases greenhouse gases.

President Trump's EPA Says Burning Wood is Carbon Neutral, Like Wind and Solar Energy
The awkwardly named Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has declared that burning wood is carbon neutral. In the eyes of the Trump regime, burning wood for energy is now just as environmentally friendly as wind and solar power, despite the fact that burning biomass releases greenhouse gases.
gizmodo.com
45回复 466 转推 701 喜欢
· 4月24日

"While burning wood immediately releases carbon, it takes decades or even a century for a replacement tree to absorb the same amount of carbon. In the meantime, all that atmospheric carbon will continue to drive climate change."

The EPA Declared That Burning Wood Is Carbon Neutral. It's Actually a Lot More Complicated
Here are five things to know about the controversial change
smithsonianmag.com
4回复 141 转推 272 喜欢
· 4月23日

Burning wood (biomass) for electricity can provide economic and waste management benefits, but it's generally bad to awful for the air and climate. Shunning science, Congress told EPA to treat biomass as carbon neutral. And that's what EPA is going to do.

EPA's Scott Pruitt says burning wood is renewable energy
The Environmental Protection Agency will begin treating energy created by burning trees as renewable, the same as wind and solar.
washingtonexaminer.com
4回复 89 转推 160 喜欢
· 4月24日

EPA chief Scott Pruitt's declaration that burning biomass—such as wood—is "carbon neutral" isn't simply rebranding, it could have substantial ramifications for tax subsidies like renewable energy credits funded by taxpayers at the state & federal level

Scott Pruitt wades into a fraught science debate, declaring biomass burning ‘carbon neutral’
Scientists aren't sure that's really true.
washingtonpost.com
58 转推 94 喜欢
· 4月23日

"Today, the numbers don’t lie: burning forest biomass for electricity is dirtier than coal and is uneconomic without massive subsidies." , Senior Advocate .

Biomass Advocates to U.S. Pols in 2017: Avoid Mistakes of EU
While European Union countries like the United Kingdom continue to burn forest biomass—primarily in the form of imported wood pellets—to produce electricity, analysis conducted in 2017 shows it’s a bad bet financially and for the environment, underscoring the dangers of...
nrdc.org
5回复 143 转推 233 喜欢
· 4月23日

“Scott Pruitt’s scorched-earth approach at the EPA continues unabated...Pruitt is once again rewarding his industry pals," Sami Yassa, senior scientist NRDC. “This will lead to more destruction of our treasured forests and more dangerous carbon pollution.”

Pruitt declares that burning wood is carbon neutral
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declared Monday that burning trees is carbon neutral.
thehill.com
6回复 142 转推 209 喜欢
· 4月24日

"The idea that biomass is carbon neutral is contentious among scientists, who fear that forests, once cleared so their wood can be used for energy, may not grow back as planned." via

Scott Pruitt wades into a fraught science debate, declaring biomass burning ‘carbon neutral’
Scientists aren't sure that's really true.
washingtonpost.com
3回复 59 转推 119 喜欢
· 4月24日

The decision is a one-two punch against conservation and climate action, and Pruitt issued the official policy “clarification” in a meeting with Georgia forest industry leaders, who will no doubt benefit from this misinterpretation of science.

Burning trees is now (somehow) carbon-neutral
The EPA now considers biomass a renewable source of energy—which is good for industry but bad news for climate change and wildlife.
nrdc.org
68 转推 108 喜欢
· 4月24日

The Energy 202: Why Scott Pruitt's decision on burning wood is so high stakes

Analysis | The Energy 202: Why Scott Pruitt's decision on burning wood is so high stakes
The notion that biomass is carbon neutral is contentious among scientists.
washingtonpost.com
10回复 47 转推 72 喜欢

更多瞬间
Ford will slowly phase out sedans from its North American lineup
Business 3小时 前
The automaker will focus on SUVs, trucks and commercial vehicles while halting production on most of its sedans. The Mustang and a new Focus Active will be the only two passenger cars coming from the brand in the future.
264 喜欢
Groom, once-paralyzed while playing football, walks wife down the aisle
US news 今天晚上
Chris Norton was given a 3% chance of regaining mobility below his neck after he fractured his C3 and C4 vertebrae during a college football game in 2010. Nearly eight years later, Norton has defeated the odds and walked seven yards down the aisle with his fiancée Emily Summers at their wedding.
2300 喜欢
Girl has leg reattached backwards so she can dance again
Health 今天早些时候
Amelia Eldred from Tamworth, England, was diagnosed with bone cancer in her left leg last year and had surgery to amputate the limb. Doctors at Royal Orthopaedic Hospital in Birmingham performed a rare procedure called rotationplasty to reattach the lower part of the leg backwards to allow the ankle joint to work as a knee joint.
4400 喜欢
Some Chinese startups are looking for 'attractive' women to comfort male coders
World news 今天下午
According to The New York Times, some Chinese tech startup companies are looking to hire "attractive" women as "programmer motivators" to chat up and assure overworked male coders.
505 喜欢

以下瞬间可能含有敏感内容。

上一页
下一步