Ga naar de content

EPA declares burning wood is same as solar and wind energy

Politics Gisteren
At the behest of Congress, Scott Pruitt announced a new Environmental Protection Agency policy that treats burning wood, or biomass, as a carbon-neutral energy source. Climate change experts contend that the science isn’t settled and that the policy ignores the greenhouse gases that result from wood burning.

. spotted in central Georgia, announcing EPA policy that burning wood is carbon-neutral. Congress directed EPA to do so, but EPA's science advisers haven't come to a consensus on the issue

13 antwoorden 71 retweets 90 vind-ik-leuks

It’s been a great day in GA! Big policy announcement on carbon neutrality of forest biomass. Managed forests improve air & water quality, while creating jobs & products that improve our daily lives. This is environmental stewardship in action.

429 antwoorden 56 retweets 138 vind-ik-leuks

Trump EPA now considers burning wood to be carbon-neutral, breaking with scientists

61 antwoorden 200 retweets 136 vind-ik-leuks

EPA declares burning wood to be a carbon neutral energy source, something scientists have been warning against for the past few years.

13 antwoorden 152 retweets 229 vind-ik-leuks

This is ridiculously anti-science. Measuring emissions from burning forest biomass is complicated. But calling it all carbon neutral is laughably wrong.

5 antwoorden 239 retweets 564 vind-ik-leuks

"While burning wood immediately releases carbon, it takes decades or even a century for a replacement tree to absorb the same amount of carbon. In the meantime, all that atmospheric carbon will continue to drive climate change."

4 antwoorden 141 retweets 272 vind-ik-leuks

Burning wood (biomass) for electricity can provide economic and waste management benefits, but it's generally bad to awful for the air and climate. Shunning science, Congress told EPA to treat biomass as carbon neutral. And that's what EPA is going to do.

4 antwoorden 89 retweets 160 vind-ik-leuks

EPA chief Scott Pruitt's declaration that burning biomass—such as wood—is "carbon neutral" isn't simply rebranding, it could have substantial ramifications for tax subsidies like renewable energy credits funded by taxpayers at the state & federal level

58 retweets 94 vind-ik-leuks

“Scott Pruitt’s scorched-earth approach at the EPA continues unabated...Pruitt is once again rewarding his industry pals," Sami Yassa, senior scientist NRDC. “This will lead to more destruction of our treasured forests and more dangerous carbon pollution.”

6 antwoorden 142 retweets 209 vind-ik-leuks

"The idea that biomass is carbon neutral is contentious among scientists, who fear that forests, once cleared so their wood can be used for energy, may not grow back as planned." via

3 antwoorden 59 retweets 119 vind-ik-leuks

The decision is a one-two punch against conservation and climate action, and Pruitt issued the official policy “clarification” in a meeting with Georgia forest industry leaders, who will no doubt benefit from this misinterpretation of science.

68 retweets 108 vind-ik-leuks

The Energy 202: Why Scott Pruitt's decision on burning wood is so high stakes

10 antwoorden 47 retweets 72 vind-ik-leuks